Tuesday, 6 December 2016
Leaning tower of PISA tables
Thoughts on PISA tables:
Because politicians and media accept the PISA paradigm: subject=test, it's impossible to argue about this methodology.
What counts as 'comprehension' are in fact scores in retrieval and inference and don't include 'feasible interpretation' = PISA thinking.
Example: Key Stage 2 SATs, test 'retrieval' and 'inference'. This does not include 'feasible interpretation' because there is only 1 answer.
We are so locked into the PISA paradigm that we now think a 'test' in a subject is the same as the subject!
All the non-testable aspects of a subject and of education are eliminated from PISA. It is only the testable that is being compared.
PISA says, 'Pupils in x country are better at subject y than pupils in z country.' It's not the 'subject'. It's the test in that subject.
Notice: all people who talk about the 'subjects' on PISA are really talking about 'the result of a test in that subject'. #verydifferent
Dear PISA, What is education for? A.Teacher.
Dear Teacher, 439. PISA
Once you're in the PISA mindset you can't get out of it. PISA is truth: truth is PISA. There is no other way of describing education.
oh no, PISA tables have gone down the table of tables. There are better tables! PISA doing cost benefit analysis of PISA to improve perf.